The Thomson Reuters decision has big implications for the battle between generative AI companies and rights holders.

Legal experts said there are key differences in Thomson Reuters' case against Ross Intelligence and other major AI-related copyright litigation.

A federal judge in Delaware on Tuesday said that a former competitor of Thomson Reuters was not permitted by U.S. copyright law to copy the information and technology company's content to build a ...

Reuters secures a major legal win against AI startup Ross over copyright infringement. Could this set a precedent for future AI lawsuits?

In 2020, Thomson Reuters sued the now-defunct AI start-up Ross Intelligence for alleged improper use of Thomson Reuters materials, including case headnotes in its Westlaw search engine, to train ...

A judge ruled in favor of Thomson Reuters in its Westlaw copyright infringement lawsuit against Ross Intelligence, an AI startup.

An AI company lifted material from Thomson Reuters' research platform, arguing fair use and innocent infringement. A court has ruled it was copyright violation.

After reconsidering the case, the judge issued a partial summary judgement, which asks whether a non-generative AI system’s content counts as original work.

Thomson Reuters has won a victory against AI start-up Ross Intelligence for its use of copyrighted data to train its own AI models.

A judge ruled in favour of Thomson Reuters, saying that a law firm's use of their legal content to train an artificial intelligence model went against US copyright laws.