(Reuters) - U.S. Supreme Court justices and federal judges can no longer avoid disclosing the value of travel-related gifts they receive by classifying such free trips as "reimbursements" on their ...
Supreme court justices in several states have been ruling in cases where conflicts of interest seem clear, including some ...
[1] No. 22-193, (April 17, 2024), https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-193_q86b.pdf. See Client Alert: The Supreme Court Grants Certiorari in Muldrow v ...
To make out a Title VII discrimination claim, a transferee must show some harm respecting an identifiable term or condition ...
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas poses during a group portrait at the Supreme Court in Washington, U.S., October 7, 2022. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein/File Photo U.S. Supreme Court Justice ...
Supreme Court justices are divided along political lines over whether or not to explain their recusals, and legal experts are very concerned. Liberal justices are giving full disclosure about ...
The Supreme Court might have bought the government's argument to censor free speech on social media platforms. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein Outside the Supreme Court Monday, a crowd of several hundred ...
Religious broadcasters are asking the Supreme Court to rule on whether their paying higher fees to stream music online than secular outfits like National Public Radio violates their First ...
The Supreme Court seemed deeply wary Monday of finding the Biden administration improperly coordinated with Big Tech companies to censor social media posts deemed “misinformation” about topics ...