On June 27, 2025, the Texas Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Cactus Water Services, LLC v. COG Operating, LLC, No. 23-0676, resolving a high-stakes dispute over the ownership of ...

In a significant decision for Texas property and energy law, the Texas Supreme Court has affirmed the Eighth Court of Appeals’ ruling in Cactus Water Services, LLC v. COG Operating, LLC, holding ...

The court delivered a win to oil and gas companies, ruling that they maintain ownership of produced water, in Cactus Water Services v. COG Operating.

A jury on Friday reached a verdict in a civil trial against Real Water, the bottled water company that made a product linked to a Southern Nevada liver failure outbreak. While jurors still need to ...

In a 5-4 ruling earlier this month, the court determined the EPA cannot impose “end result” provisions in permits that regulate water pollution.

It’s easy to get lost in the technical weeds of a lawsuit, especially over water rights. These cases are complicated and confusing. The only people paying close attention are lawyers, water ...

Ruling halts construction on Gross Reservoir dam more than halfway through Colorado project A federal judge on Thursday ordered a halt to construction on a reservoir dam that Denver Water says is ...

Challenges to property deeds in Arizona cities and towns must typically be made within five years, even if forgery could be involved, according to a new Arizona Supreme Court ruling.

The court found "substantial and scientifically credible evidence" of fluoride's risk but stopped short of concluding fluoride is harmful to public health.

Colorado's largest water utility is prohibited from expanding Gross Reservoir, but can continue construction on Gross Dam, according to the ruling.

MONTEREY – A ruling by a state appellate court against the Monterey Peninsula Water Management District could have what is being described as a minor impact on the district’s water supply ...

The 5-4 ruling found that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency permits were too vague in their interpretation of the Clean Water Act.