News
The Ohio Supreme Court has allowed ... H.B. 68 included both a ban on trans athletes and on gender-affirming care. Then, in August 2024, the same judge ruled that none of the ACLU’s legal ...
The Ohio Supreme Court has paused an appellate court decision that deemed the state's ban on gender-affirming ... health care in their home state." A Franklin County judge ruled in August 2024 ...
Ohio's ban on gender-affirming care for minors is now back in ... the state's 10th District Court of Appeals reversed the decision after a judge found it “reasonably limits parents' rights.” ...
The Ohio Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that a state law prohibiting minors from receiving gender-affirming care can be enforced as court battles proceed over the law’s constitutionality.
COLUMBUS, Ohio — Ohio may enforce its ban on gender-affirming care for minors while an appeal ... which reversed the lower court judge’s decision allowing the law to go into effect, on grounds ...
COLUMBUS, Ohio - The Ohio Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that a law prohibiting Ohioans under the age of 18 from receiving gender-affirming care can be in effect as a legal appeal proceeds.
Missoula County District Court Judge Jason Marks peppered questions at a lawyer for the State of Montana in a hearing Thursday about whether a bill that bans gender-affirming care for minors is ...
The Catholic groups also challenged separate EEOC guidelines for enforcing anti-harassment laws, which the agency updated last year to specify that workers cannot be harassed over their gender ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results