A U.S. judge has found Apple intentionally violated a court order prohibiting it from anti-competitive conduct. Held in civil contempt of court, the tech giant is also facing an investigation for ...

Epic Games told the court in March 2024 that Apple was “blatantly” violating the court’s order, including by imposing a new 27% fee on app developers when Apple customers complete an app ...

Apple had denied violating terms of the court’s order. Apple and Epic Games did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Apple's appeal notice did include its planned legal arguments.

U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers excoriated Apple for willfully violating her 2021 decision ... An appellate court upheld this order, which went into effect after the U.S. Supreme ...

Apple had denied violating terms of the court’s order. WHY DID THE JUDGE MAKE A CRIMINAL CONTEMPT REFERRAL? On top of finding Apple took steps to evade her injunction, Gonzalez Rogers referred ...

"That it thought this court would tolerate such insubordination was a gross miscalculation." Apple's response to the injunction was two-pronged — offer a complicated external linking solution ...

(AP PHOTO) Apple in a statement said "we strongly disagree with the decision. We will comply with the court's order and we will appeal." Epic Games chief executive Tim Sweeney called the judge's order ...

"There are no do-overs once a party willfully disregards a court order." Citing business documents, Rogers wrote that Apple's vice president of finance, Alex Roman, "outright lied under oath," and ...

Epic Games told the court in March 2024 that Apple was “blatantly” violating the court’s order, including by imposing a new 27% fee on app developers when Apple customers complete an app ...