I mentioned it in passing in my Friday column, but I was struck — disturbed, really — by one specific point made by Justice Samuel Alito during Thursday’s oral arguments in Trump v.
Wade in 2022, Justice Samuel Alito seemed to endorse the idea that a fetus needs the same “stabilizing treatment” as the pregnant person. The conservative justice zeroed in on the law’s ...
And none more belligerently than Samuel Alito. His line of questioning to Michael Dreeben, the attorney arguing the special counsel’s case, was from some perverse Lewis Carroll universe ...
And none more belligerently than Samuel Alito. His line of questioning to Michael Dreeben, the attorney arguing the special counsel’s case, was from some perverse Lewis Carroll universe: Now if an ...
Late in the argument, Alito—who wrote the majority opinion in Dobbs that allows laws like Idaho’s to be enforced—was upset that not enough time had been devoted to the existence of the words ...
Wade in 2022, Justice Samuel Alito seemed to endorse the idea that a fetus needs the same “stabilizing treatment” as the pregnant person. The conservative justice zeroed in on the law’s reference to ...
And Alito just laughs it off as though it’s a big joke. Because we all know Justice Department attorneys are hacks who’ll do whatever they want, right? And a grand jury will indict a ham ...
I'm on fire right now, like the guy outside the courthouse, right?" The joke — a reference to a man who set himself on fire outside the courthouse where Trump's criminal trial was taking place ...
Despite putting their livelihoods on the line for the sake of the bit, there are some positives that come with the “joke swap” tradition. It allows the anchors to banter with each other which ...
Perhaps the most clarifying moment of the day came in a colloquy between conservative Justice Samuel Alito and liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor, arguably the leaders of each wing of the court.